Pages

Nov 26, 2008

Criticism on the Twilight Critics

Twilight

Stephenie Meyer's Twilight (The Twilight Saga, Book 1)Twilight novel recently made its debut on the big screen as a movie starring Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart. The first of Stephenie's "vampire" series has had mixed reviews. I've read both Anne Rice's "vampire" writings and Stephenie Meyer's book and I must say, these critics who put down Stephenie Meyer's book are forgetting who the target audience is in her series. They criticize her writing style, complaining that it lacks substance. What substance are they looking for? The gory details about the vampire kills and in-depth historical perspectives that you can read about in Anne Rice's Vampire Chronicles? Would Stephenie Meyer's target teen audience really be interested in reading all that? Or wouldn't the frequent mention of love and crushing stares be more interesting? Right.

I've also read criticism about the conversations between the characters of the The Twilight SagaTwilight, remarks that their dialogues were "bland" or "corny". Most of the characters in the novel are teenagers, for crying out loud. I think Stephenie Meyer painted a fairly realistic view of teenagers in her novel by not making them sound too intellectual, yet drawing some emphasis on their unsureness, their "dazzlement" with their desires and physical affection. In the story, both Edward and Bella deal with their growing desires for one another, yet wondering at the same time, why they are so attracted to each other, realizing that there is "something" that is not quite normal or right about the entire situation. It's a theme that successfully keeps the reader wondering where all this will lead to in the end.


Kristen Stewart
Stephenie Meyers is no dummy when it comes to writing. With a degree in English to back her, I think Stephenie Meyers kept her writing style in a manner that holds the target audience's interest very well. Her descriptions are clear and the flow of events is smooth enough to follow along well enough to be able to allow the reader with an active imagination to picture every scene in their minds without feeling overwhelmed by an overabundance of information unrelated to the specific event. Heck, she has even been able to win a very large adult fan base with her vivid descriptions of Bella's thoughts and feelings, the very same things that many young people experience when they fall obsessively in love with someone, not just with a vampire. If anyone who claims to have fallen in love with someone before can't remember how their thoughts always seemed to be forcibly preoccupied by visions of their "loved" one's face, wishes to touch or hold that person, or even fantasies about kissing that person, then they've never felt this kind of "love" that millions of readers and movie-goers have enjoyed for decades in other popular novels and movies. And this is exactly the kind of love that you find in this teenage romance novel which happens to have a vampire for one of the characters.

In all retrospect, I just want to tell the critics who give The Twilight Saga a negative review to read the book first and keep in mind who the intended readers are...then maybe they can have something sensible to say about the whole thing.



5 comments:

KP said...

I'm sorry, but I think you're forgetting that Twilight is badly written. The conversations are bland and unrealistic. She uses more cliches than a trashy romance paperback. And I know that if you are a fan, you will most probably just dismiss criticism, but please, and I really mean this, PLEASE just actually think about this. Something that might really give you a lot of insight - go see wikipedia's article on "Mary Sue" - a literary phenomenon - and just keep Twilight in mind while you're reading the article. If you are actually an intelligent person, you literally cannot deny that the "Mary Sue" (as only one of many weak points about this series) applies to virtually every character in Twilight (though especially to Bella, Edward, Alice)

KP said...

I think it is basically undeniable that Twilight is bland, unimaginative wish-fulfillment and completely self-indulgent.

Liggybee said...

Thanks, Kristien, I appreciate the feedback. I probably thought more positively about Twilight because there's a lot about Bella's character that I can relate to in my own life. So yes, I probably do (intentionally) overlook the bland dialogue of Twilight's characters because when I was a teenager, I had the hardest time holding conversations with others, especially with the opposite sex. So in a way, I guess I felt Twilight reflected a lot of me when I was a teenager. (I'm much older and way different now, by the way).

Anonymous said...

So you're saying that teenagers would read enything, no matter if it was poorly written and pointless?
This book shouldn't be adviced for teenagers because they are not morons, they are just teenagers.
It's like feeding your kids with icecream for every meal. They would happily take it but the consecuences will show later.
The only message I found in those books is that you don't have to do absolutely nothing with your life, you just have to wait for some hot dude and that is the end of the story.

Liggybee said...

I was inclined to reject the comment above (I moderate comments on posts older than 30 days) mainly because of spelling and grammatical errors in the comment.

But while Anonymous has an interesting comparison about the book and ice cream, I think that the comment fails to realize that not all books are meant to educate. Some books are meant solely to entertain (for fantasy and imagination). Books help you learn to visualize concepts described in words, rather than rely on video or graphics to "show" you.

You might want to look at my newest post, Bloggers Unite For Literacy and check out some of the links to learn more about literacy and how it benefits us all - all over the world.